Glossed Over: Taking a closer look at what advertisers are really selling.
I’ve tried so hard to like American Apparel, with its “Made in LA,” sweatshop-free guarantees. Lately, they’ve gotten more press for thinking neon high-waisted leggings are an important fashion statement (they are not) than their pro-worker practices. But they’re still the only clothing company I’ve found that publishes their factory workers’ salary and benefits info on the website so I try to keep an open mind.
But there’s no question that founder Dov Charney is a total weirdo (remember that bizarre Jane Magazine interview? No? You’re better off). And now, his sexual harrassment-fueled managerial style has extended to dictating beauty standards to his female employees, as in the above lesson on eyebrow grooming, leaked to Jezebel by an outraged staffer.
Okay, so most workplaces have a dress code. At Beauty U, we wear all black under our uniform aprons, and we’ve been given clear directives about making ourselves presentable before interacting with clients. And I get that working fashion or beauty retail means personifying the brand, and entitles your employer to a say in your appearance.
But the eyebrow thing crosses the line because American Apparel doesn’t seem to care about the eyebrows of male employees — and because it encourages female employees and customers to dress like prostitutes on clown detail. If you work there, are you just supposed to make your peace with that, the way any Dunkin Donuts employee resigns herself to the orange polyester? Uniforms serve a practical purpose in the retail workplace, enabling customers to identify employees, but they’re also a none too subtle way of making sure your workers know their place. Should that level of employer control extend to your body?
When a company like American Apparel markets extreme personal style and freedom of expression (because I can give no justification for those leggings beyond the First Amendment), they should keep their hands off employees’ brows — and bodies in general. And I’ll be bearing that in mind the next time I’m running low on baby tees and unitards.

5 Comments
December 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM
This reminds me of the early 60s, when flight attendants had to be weighted and measured every month so they could preserve the company image ( of flying prostitutes). Airlines, thanks to EOC got beyond this and discovered that even men and older women could hand out pretzels and coffee.
December 17, 2009 at 6:53 AM
[...] Tuesday, I told you about American Apparel instructing female employees on eyebrow grooming. Now, bellasugar is reporting on two cases where elementary school children are in trouble over [...]
December 17, 2009 at 11:11 PM
So interesting to be filled in about American Apparel….. A little bit too far down on my to-do list for years has been figuring out who to complain to at U. Penn (the real estate office, the Women’s Center?) about their weird, verging on pornographic ads featuring young, beat up, drugged looking girls in their underwear in their store front windows rented from Penn, right across the street from the main campus….. So now I have to put those ads together with the fact that they pay their workers well….. Somehow seems to make the ads even more creepy.
December 21, 2009 at 6:44 AM
[...] wax, says the NYT. And you are paying it, because not plucking is no longer an option (remember American Apparel’s feelings on that?) and over-plucking is a crime so heinous that 3,484 corrective eyebrow [...]
January 5, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Wow, I had no idea about the eyebrow regulations. I’m not surprised though–there’s definitely a Dov “type”. Ick. Let’s all pass on working for him.